One of the best and most effective programs in Pennsylvania for
preserving farmland and open-space is "Act 319", the Clean and Green Act. It encourages
Pennsylvania farmers and open-space landowners to hold on to their
farmland, woodland, and open-space land properties. To do this, a
preferential assessment for property tax purposes is given to land
enrolled in the Clean and Green program.
Thus, rather than assess farmland, woodland, and open-space land
enrolled in the Clean and Green program at the rather overpriced and
inflated land values in high-development areas such as Monroe County,
Clean and Green land is assessed at much lower values. These lower
values are based on the value of land used for agricultural and
open-space purposes rather than for residential and commercial
development purposes.
"(a) . . . The act provides for land
devoted to agricultural use, agricultural reserve use or forest reserve
use to be assessed at the value it has for that use rather than at fair
market value. The intent of the act is to encourage the keeping of land
in one of these uses." (7 Pa. Code §137.b1)
If it were not for the Clean and Green Act, many farmers would be
forced or enticed to sell their lands to developers because of the high
taxes on their acreage. That's because without the preferential
assessment, the return on investment in their property if not
preferentially assessed goes negative -- very negative. Likewise for
owners of open-space and woodland.
Until the 2006 assessment-year, the farmstead land in Monroe County was
assessed at the Clean and Green program preferential-value. In 2005, Donna Asure voted to take the farmstead
land in the agriculture reserve and forest reserve categories out of
the preferential-value assessment and assess that farmstead land at
full-development land value.
Simply put, farmstead land is the portion of a property enrolled in the
Clean and Green program upon which the house and farm buildings are
situated. The Monroe Country tax assessor usually considers that
to be about an acre.
"Farmstead land -- Any curtilage and land
situated under a residence, farm building or other building which
supports a residence, including a residential garage or
workshop." (7 Pa. Code §137.b2)
"Curtilage -- The land
surrounding a residential structure and farm building used for a yard,
driveway, onlot sewage system or access to any building on the
tract." (7 Pa. Code §137.b2)
The slick and dirty trick Dona Asure
pulled off by taking farmstead land out of the Clean and Green
assessment is to increase the Monroe
County property taxes paid by the owners of these agriculture reserve
and forest reserve farmstead properties without hiking the
County millage rate.
Keep in mind there are three ways property taxes can be hiked:
(1) by increasing the millage levied
against a property,
(2) by increasing the
appraised market value of a property, or
(3) by increasing the
assessment ratio. For all intents and purposes, increasing any one of
these three values is a property tax hike.
Here is the way that works. The tax assessor appraises a property and
sets a "fair" market value on that property. (What the assessor
does is not always that "fair" a value.)
The County Commissioners set an assessment ratio in order to determine
an assessed value for each property. The appraised market value of a
property is multiplied by the assessment ratio to set an assessed value
for the property.
Then the assessed value is multiplied by the tax millage levy to
determine the property tax for the property.
For example, let's say a property is appraised at a $100,000 market
value. Multiplying that $100,000 by the Monroe County assessment ratio
of 25% yields an assessed value of $25,000. Then multiplying that
$25,000 assessed value by the Monroe County tax levy or 14.5-mills sets
the County property tax at $362.50. ($25,000 x 0.0145 =
$362.50)
[continued in column 2
------>>]
Let Us Know
Do you have some thoughts about Donna Asure, Mike Carroll, John
Siptroph, or Maureen Tatu and their qualifications for the Pennsylvania
General Assembly that you would like to share with us? If so, you may
send an e-mail to us at election2006
AT westendvoice DOT com
Would you like to report a road in Chestnuthill Township that is
riddled with potholes and has been neglected by the Gould regime? If
so, drop an e-mail to us.
If you want to send us a digital photo please use the .jpg format and
make sure the photo file size does not exceed 25-KB. E-mail with
anything larger will be trashed by our filters. Also, please do not use
HTML e-mail -- send text-based e-mail only. HTML e-mail will be
filtered out.
chestnuthill-potholes AT
WestEndVoice DOT com
Do you think Chuck Gould, Maureen
Tatu, and Leigh Kane should be fired -- or do you know anything else
they screwed up? If so, please send us a text-only e-mail.
fire-gould AT
WestEndVoice DOT com
|
|
[continued from column 1]
But there are three more taxing
bodies that pick the property owners' pockets. For example if the
property is in Chestnuthill there is a 4-mill Chestnuthill township tax
levy. For that same $100,000 property with an assessed value of
$25,000, the Chestnuthill Township property tax is $100. ($25,000 x
0.004 = $100)
Add to that the Pleasant Valley School District property tax. There the
millage is 124.15 mills. That makes the PVSD property tax $3103.75.
($25,000 x 0.12415 = $3103.75)
Don't forget there also is a 1-mill Library tax levied too in the West
End. That comes to $25 for a $100,000 market value home.($25,000 x .001
= $25)
Adding all four property taxes together, the total property tax for a
$100,000 market value property in Chestnuthill Township, the Pleasant
Valley School District, and Monroe County is $3,591.25.
Last year Donna Asure
voted for the provision related to implementation
of the Clean and Green Act in Monroe County that in effect increased
property taxes for smaller, family farms and open-space land in Monroe
County.
When Donna Asure voted to take the farmstead land in the agriculture
reserve and forest reserve categories out of the preferential-value
assessment and assess that farmstead land at full-development land
value, she increased the assessed
value on some 1,300 properties in
Monroe County enrolled in the Clean and Green Program.
The market value of an acre of land in Monroe County will vary greatly
across townships and even within townships. Let's guess an average
market value for an acre of land in Monroe County to be about $15,000.
That means that taking the farmstead acre out of the preferential
assessment increases the Monroe County property tax about $54.38 per
farmstead. That comes to about $71,000 ($70,687) in additional property
tax revenue for Monroe County.
However, consider the total 143.65 mills when you add the Monroe
County, PVSD, Chestnuthill Township, and Western Pocono Library tax
levies together. Then, the increase
in total property taxes for that
farmstead acre in the Chestnuthill Township example comes to $542
altogether. That amounts to a 15% property tax hike over the $3,591.25
computed above.
The total millages across municipalities and school districts in Monroe
County vary some. The Pocono Mountain School District millage is 114.95
mills. In the Stroudsburg School District, it is 119 mills. And in the
East Stroudsburg School District it is 131.46 mills for properties in
Monroe County.
There is lots of variation in tax millage levies across the various
Monroe County municipalities too. The property tax levy for Hamilton
Township is only 1 mill. In Jackson Township it is 8 mills. Pocono
Township levies 9.125 mills – but unlike the other townships listed
here, Pocono Township also supports its own township police department.
Using Chestnuthill Township as a representative municipality, Donna
Asure screwed 1300 Clean and Green property owners out of $704,600 just
to get an extra $71,000 for her to add to her Monroe County spending
spree. That's not fair. That's not right!
A 15% hike in property taxes easily could force some farmers and
open-space landowners to sell or subdivide their farms and open-space
land. That's because they can no longer afford to pay the higher
property taxes. Or because the higher property taxes no longer justify
preserving the farmland or open-space land. Taking the farmstead
properties out of the Clean and Green program was just plain careless
and stupid!
Donna Asure is doing
enough damage with her fiscal irresponsibility and
tax hiking ways in Monroe County. Just imagine how much more damage she
could and would do in Harrisburg.
Send Donna Asure a message
that you do not like what she is doing. Let
Donna Asure know that you do not like her hiking taxes, hurting
farmers, hurting open-space preservation, and screwing up Monroe
County. And let Donna Asure know that you do not like her
misrepresenting her tax-hiking activities. Vote against Donna Asure on
November 7, 2006.
For more about how bad a job
Maureen Tatu is doing as a Chestnuthill Township Supervisor see:
Don't forget that Chuck Gould,
Maureen Tatu, and Leigh Kane also have neglected to solve the
Brodheadsville Bottleneck problem too. See
Brodheadsville's
Rt. 209 Traffic Bottleneck Can and Must Be Fixed in
the West
End Voice, Volume 14 No. 1 © May 9, 2005.
For more about the sorry state of Chestnuthill
Township Roads, See Chestnuthill
Township Roads Neglected by Gould and Supervisors
in the West
End Voice, Volume 14 No. 2 © May 16, 2005.
Copyright & Permissions Notice
Copyright 2006 by The West
End Voice. All
rights reserved.
Associated Press (AP) members may print this newspaper in its entirety
(only) in their print publications. Any person or organization may
place
a link in their Web site to this page. Otherwise, do not copy,
duplicate,
or redistribute this newspaper or any parts thereof in any form. Printable Version (PDF -
136-KB) Requires Acrobat Reader 5.0 or better.
|