About West End Voice
Previous Editions
Contact Us
Printable Version This Page  (PDF)
Main Page

The West End Voice

Liberty
Volume 15 No. 2 ©  October 26, 2006 -- Page 2



About the Clean and Green Act and How Donna Asure Screwed Farmers and Open-Space Landowners


By J.J. Publius


One of the best and most effective programs in Pennsylvania for preserving farmland and open-space is "Act 319", the Clean and Green Act. It encourages Pennsylvania farmers and open-space landowners to hold on to their farmland, woodland, and open-space land properties.  To do this, a preferential assessment for property tax purposes is given to land enrolled in the Clean and Green program.

Thus, rather than assess farmland, woodland, and open-space land enrolled in the Clean and Green program at the rather overpriced and inflated land values in high-development areas such as Monroe County, Clean and Green land is assessed at much lower values. These lower values are based on the value of land used for agricultural and open-space purposes rather than for residential and commercial development purposes.

"(a) . . . The act provides for land devoted to agricultural use, agricultural reserve use or forest reserve use to be assessed at the value it has for that use rather than at fair market value. The intent of the act is to encourage the keeping of land in one of these uses."  (7 Pa. Code §137.b1)

If it were not for the Clean and Green Act, many farmers would be forced or enticed to sell their lands to developers because of the high taxes on their acreage. That's because without the preferential assessment, the return on investment in their property if not preferentially assessed goes negative -- very negative. Likewise for owners of open-space and woodland.

Until the 2006 assessment-year, the farmstead land in Monroe County was assessed at the Clean and Green program preferential-value. In 2005, Donna Asure voted to take the farmstead land in the agriculture reserve and forest reserve categories out of the preferential-value assessment and assess that farmstead land at full-development land value.
                       
Simply put, farmstead land is the portion of a property enrolled in the Clean and Green program upon which the house and farm buildings are situated.  The Monroe Country tax assessor usually considers that to be about an acre.   

"Farmstead land -- Any curtilage and land situated under a residence, farm building or other building which supports a residence, including a residential garage or workshop."  (7 Pa. Code §137.b2)

"Curtilage -- The land surrounding a residential structure and farm building used for a yard, driveway, onlot sewage system or access to any building on the tract."  (7 Pa. Code §137.b2)

The slick and dirty trick Dona Asure pulled off by taking farmstead land out of the Clean and Green assessment is to increase the Monroe County property taxes paid by the owners of these agriculture reserve and forest reserve farmstead properties without hiking the County millage rate.

Keep in mind there are three ways property taxes can be hiked:
(1) by increasing the millage levied against a property,
(2) by increasing the appraised market value of a property, or
(3) by increasing the assessment ratio. For all intents and purposes, increasing any one of these three values is a property tax hike.
                                               
Here is the way that works. The tax assessor appraises a property and sets a "fair" market value on that property.  (What the assessor does is not always that "fair" a value.)

The County Commissioners set an assessment ratio in order to determine an assessed value for each property. The appraised market value of a property is multiplied by the assessment ratio to set an assessed value for the property.

Then the assessed value is multiplied by the tax millage levy to determine the property tax for the property.

For example, let's say a property is appraised at a $100,000 market value. Multiplying that $100,000 by the Monroe County assessment ratio of 25% yields an assessed value of $25,000. Then multiplying that $25,000 assessed value by the Monroe County tax levy or 14.5-mills sets the County property tax at $362.50. ($25,000 x 0.0145 = $362.50)               
                           
[continued in column 2 ------>>]

Let Us Know

Do you have some thoughts about Donna Asure, Mike Carroll, John Siptroph, or Maureen Tatu and their qualifications for the Pennsylvania General Assembly that you would like to share with us? If so, you may send an e-mail to us at election2006 AT westendvoice DOT com

Would you like to report a road in Chestnuthill Township that is riddled with potholes and has been neglected by the Gould regime? If so, drop an e-mail to us.

If you want to send us a digital photo please use the .jpg format and make sure the photo file size does not exceed 25-KB. E-mail with anything larger will be trashed by our filters. Also, please do not use HTML e-mail -- send text-based e-mail only. HTML e-mail will be filtered out.

chestnuthill-potholes AT WestEndVoice DOT com

Do you think Chuck Gould, Maureen Tatu, and Leigh Kane should be fired -- or do you know anything else they screwed up? If so, please send us a text-only e-mail.

fire-gould AT WestEndVoice DOT com



[continued from column 1]

But there are three more taxing bodies that pick the property owners' pockets. For example if the property is in Chestnuthill there is a 4-mill Chestnuthill township tax levy. For that same $100,000 property with an assessed value of $25,000, the Chestnuthill Township property tax is $100. ($25,000 x 0.004 = $100)
                                   
Add to that the Pleasant Valley School District property tax. There the millage is 124.15 mills. That makes the PVSD property tax $3103.75. ($25,000 x 0.12415 = $3103.75)


Don't forget there also is a 1-mill Library tax levied too in the West End. That comes to $25 for a $100,000 market value home.($25,000 x .001 = $25)

Adding all four property taxes together, the total property tax for a $100,000 market value property in Chestnuthill Township, the Pleasant Valley School District, and Monroe County is $3,591.25.

                          
Last year Donna Asure voted for the provision related to implementation of the Clean and Green Act in Monroe County that in effect increased property taxes for smaller, family farms and open-space land in Monroe County.

When Donna Asure voted to take the farmstead land in the agriculture reserve and forest reserve categories out of the preferential-value assessment and assess that farmstead land at full-development land value, she increased the assessed value on some 1,300 properties in Monroe County enrolled in the Clean and Green Program.
                                       
The market value of an acre of land in Monroe County will vary greatly across townships and even within townships. Let's guess an average market value for an acre of land in Monroe County to be about $15,000. That means that taking the farmstead acre out of the preferential assessment increases the Monroe County property tax about $54.38 per farmstead. That comes to about $71,000 ($70,687) in additional property tax revenue for Monroe County.        


However, consider the total 143.65 mills when you add the Monroe County, PVSD, Chestnuthill Township, and Western Pocono Library tax levies together. Then, the increase in total property taxes for that farmstead acre in the Chestnuthill Township example comes to $542 altogether. That amounts to a 15% property tax hike over the $3,591.25 computed above.

The total millages across municipalities and school districts in Monroe County vary some. The Pocono Mountain School District millage is 114.95 mills. In the Stroudsburg School District, it is 119 mills. And in the East Stroudsburg School District it is 131.46 mills for properties in Monroe County.

There is lots of variation in tax millage levies across the various Monroe County municipalities too. The property tax levy for Hamilton Township is only 1 mill. In Jackson Township it is 8 mills. Pocono Township levies 9.125 mills – but unlike the other townships listed here, Pocono Township also supports its own township police department.

Using Chestnuthill Township as a representative municipality, Donna Asure screwed 1300 Clean and Green property owners out of $704,600 just to get an extra $71,000 for her to add to her Monroe County spending spree. That's not fair. That's not right!

A 15% hike in property taxes easily could force some farmers and open-space landowners to sell or subdivide their farms and open-space land. That's because they can no longer afford to pay the higher property taxes. Or because the higher property taxes no longer justify preserving the farmland or open-space land. Taking the farmstead properties out of the Clean and Green program was just plain careless and stupid!                               

Donna Asure is doing enough damage with her fiscal irresponsibility and tax hiking ways in Monroe County. Just imagine how much more damage she could and would do in Harrisburg.

Send Donna Asure a message that you do not like what she is doing. Let Donna Asure know that you do not like her hiking taxes, hurting farmers, hurting open-space preservation, and screwing up Monroe County. And let Donna Asure know that you do not like her misrepresenting her tax-hiking activities. Vote against Donna Asure on November 7, 2006.


For more about how bad a job Maureen Tatu is doing as a Chestnuthill Township Supervisor see:





Don't forget that Chuck Gould, Maureen Tatu, and Leigh Kane also have neglected to solve the Brodheadsville Bottleneck problem too. See Brodheadsville's Rt. 209 Traffic Bottleneck Can and Must Be Fixed in the West End Voice, Volume 14 No. 1 ©  May 9, 2005. 

For more about the sorry state of Chestnuthill Township Roads, See Chestnuthill Township Roads Neglected by Gould and Supervisors in the West End Voice, Volume 14 No. 2 ©  May 16, 2005.



Copyright & Permissions Notice
 
Copyright 2006 by The West End Voice. All rights reserved. Associated Press (AP) members may print this newspaper in its entirety (only) in their print publications. Any person or organization may place a link in their Web site to this page. Otherwise, do not copy, duplicate, or redistribute this newspaper or any parts thereof in any form. Printable Version (PDF - 136-KB) Requires Acrobat Reader 5.0 or better.


Check our national publication, The American Voice.

A simple plan to give Katrina refugees their own new homes and new lives
The American Voice, Volume 8 No. 2,  September 5, 2005
The American Voice, Volume 8 No. 3,  September 15, 2005